Blog

Slow vs Rapid weight loss | Dr Bazire

Written by Philip Bazire | January 07, 2020

Debate continues into how the rate of weight loss might affect the long-term efficacy of a weight-loss programme. For many years, most experts in nutrition argued that rapid weight loss is always followed by rapid weight regain, and perhaps even to a higher weight than before dieting.

Fortunately, we now have a considerable volume of evidence that disproves this pessimistic outlook. In the latter part of the last century, clinical trials started to reveal how it really wasn’t the rate of weight loss that determined the rate or extent of weight regain, but rather the general approach to obesity that mattered.

Let’s have a look at some of the findings:

  •  The final weight loss that is typically achieved with a diet programme appears to be strongly related to the amount of weight you lose in the initial 3 to 8 weeks. (Refs 1-3)
  •  Rapid weight loss maintains motivation, evidenced by the fact that more individuals drop out of slow weight loss programmes than rapid ones. (Ref 4)
  • The total weight loss is greater with a rapid weight loss programme than with slow weight loss. (Ref 2)
  • The metabolic benefits (blood glucose control, improved blood fats) are more closely linked to the total weight loss than to the rate of weight loss (though the nutrient balance is also important). (Ref 5)
  • Weight regain does not differ between groups of patients in slow weight loss programmes and rapid weight loss. (Ref 6)
  • Prof Susan Jebb (University of Oxford and member of the Public Health England Obesity Programme Board), among others, has described how the harm done by overweight and obesity depends on the total time an individual spends in that situation. This is logical: the sooner we reduce the risk of obesity-related chronic diseases, such as diabetes or heart disease, the better.7 And even if weight gradually returns, the time spent out of the obese weight range has ben shown to have a lasting benefit. The US Diabetes Prevention Trial showed that even after temporary weight loss, a reduction in the risk of diabetes persisted for at least 15 years. (Ref 8)

The conclusions we can draw from the findings of these research studies are the following:

  •  Rapid weight loss appears to be more effective in both the short term and the long term.
  •  More individuals are likely to achieve their weight-loss goal with rapid weight loss.
  • The health benefits are likely to be greater with rapid weight loss (because of the greater weight loss)
  • Whatever approach is used to achieve weight loss, additional measures are essential to prevent weight regain.

What does this all mean for you if you need to lose weight?

Everyone is different and the approach to weight loss must be individualised. As health professionals working in weight management, first we must be able and willing to discuss and explain the multiple options available to you and help you find the one most likely to work for you based on the aetiology of your weight gain and on your current state of health. And second, any proposed weight management programme must include a plan to avoid weight regain. Without this second part, all your investment (economic and your personal effort) is likely to be wasted.

A programme that fulfils the above requirements necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, with medical supervision (health and safety, goal setting, weight-loss method), dietitian/nutritionist (diet design, nutrient balance), personal trainer (physical activity), psychologist/therapist (motivation and relationship with food). Not all these disciplines are needed in every case, but they must be available when necessary.

References:
View full post